Page 120 - The Indian Optician Digital Edition November-December 2021
P. 120

(22.32 ± 2.685) years with a range of 20 – 30 years. The mean axial   inferior (SE G1:125.39 ± 14.48)
          length was 24.28 ± 0.72 mm.                                          (SE G2:117.17 ± 13.57) (p = 0.020),
                                                                               nasal (SE G1: 69.55 ± 8.44) (SE
             The table shows the values of the independent samples T-test      G2: 65.83 ± 6.16) (p = 0.047)
          in AXL Group 1 & 2, where a comparison of RNFL Thickness of the      quadrants except temporal (SE
          mean difference between AXL G1 and AXL G2 was done in each           G1:61.89 ± 7.89)  (SE G2:67.70 ±
          quadrant. The table shows the mean value with its standard
          deviation and statistically significant P-value for all quadrants.   9.94) (p = 0.009) quadrants and
                                                                               also decrease in average RNFL
             The table shows the values of Independent samples T-test in SE  thickness (SE G1:94.92 ± 9.18)
          Group 1 & 2, where a comparison of RNFL Thickness of the mean        (SE G2:92.67 ± 9.02) (p = 0.315)
          difference between SE G1 & SE G2 was done in each quadrant.          with an increase in degree
          The table shows the mean value with its standard deviation and       of refractive error. [Table: 2]
          statistically significant P-value for all quadrants.                 It is quite similar to a study
          DISCUSSION                                                           by Sonika Porwal, Suneetha
                                                                               Nithyanandam, Mary Joseph,
                                                                                                 2
             In this study, it was found that RNFL was thickest in the         Andrew K Vasnaik.
          superior (120.44 ± 17.45) and inferior (121.76 ± 14.57) quadrants       Finding a thinner RNFL
          and thinner in the temporal (64.46 ± 9.25) and nasal (67.91 ± 7.69)   in more myopic eyes may
          quadrants. Mohammad Salih , report a difference between the
                                       3
          nasal (64.9±9.8) and temporal (75.9±16.1) RNFL thickness, with the   explain, to a certain degree,
          nasal quadrant thinner than the temporal quadrant. However,          the relationship between
          it was also found that the temporal RNFL thickness was thinner       glaucoma and myopia, which is
          than the nasal quadrant. This was consistent with results reported   known to be a risk factor for the
          by other studies. 4,2                                                development of glaucoma.

             The study demonstrated that the RNFL thickness decreases             The clinical significance
          in superior (AXLG1:121.40 ± 21.25) (AXL G2:119.42 ± 12.48) (p = 0.644),   is that the thin polar RNFL
          inferior (AXL G1:125.46 ± 15.67) (AXL G2:117.85 ± 12.37) (p =0.030),   in myopes could be wrongly
          nasal (AXL G1: 69.69 ± 8.47) (AXL G2: 66.03 ± 6.38) (p = 0.049)      interpreted as glaucomatous
          quadrants except temporal (AXL G1:63.91 ± 9.19) (AXL G2:65.03 ±      change if one fails to take into
          9.42) (p = 0.623) quadrants and also decrease in average RNFL        account the effect of axial
          thickness (AXL G1:95.60 ± 10.12) (AXL G2:92.15 ± 7.68) (p = 0.120) with   length, by adjusting for it in the
          an increase in the axial length. [Table: 1] This is quite similar to a   current OCT nomograms. So, in
          study by Sonika Porwal, Suneetha Nithyanandam, Mary Joseph,          the eyes with myopia, especially
          Andrew K Vasnaik.  2                                                 those with moderate and high
                                                                               myopia, a careful interpretation
             So, after the comparison of the RNFL thickness of each            of OCT is needed.
          quadrant between two Axial length groups, it was observed
          that the RNFL thickness in the inferior and nasal quadrants had         The effect of myopia on
          statistically decreased with increasing axial length, whereas the    peripapillary RNFL thickness
          superior, temporal, and average quadrants were statistically         has been studied extensively,
          insignificant with increasing AXL.                                   although the results are
             Similarly, it was found that in the comparison of RNFL            conflicting. Several studies
          thickness of each quadrant between two Spherical Equivalent          found that when myopia and
          groups, the RNFL thickness in the inferior, nasal and temporal       axial length increased, average
          quadrants statistically decreased with increasing SE, whereas the    RNFL thickness decreased.
          superior and average quadrants were statistically insignificant      They also discovered that high
          with an increasing degree of refractive error.                       myopes had thinner RNFLs
                                                                               than low myopes, as well as
             The study demonstrated that RNFL thickness decrease in            differing topographic profiles,
          superior ( SE G1:120.66 ± 15.96) (SE G2:120.17 ± 19.46) (p = 0.909),   leading to the conclusion that


           | NOV-DEC 2021 | 116  CLINICAL
   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125