Page 123 - The Indian Optician Digital Edition September-October 2021
P. 123

DISCUSSION

                                                                                 In this study of 60 eyes, 2%
                                                                              presented with Pupillary Block
                                                                              Glaucoma; 2% with Neovascular
                                                                              Glaucoma; 5% with AACG; 5%
                                                                              with SACG; 8% with PACS; 38%
                                                                              with CACG; and most of the eyes
                                                                              were 40% with PACG.

                                                                                The effectivity of YAG PI is
                                                                              high in all types of angle-closure
                                                                              glaucoma patients, specifically
                                                                              in patients with PACG and CACG.
                                                                              There was also a significant
          iii.  Patient with all types of open-angle             difference in patients using AGM medicines
             glaucoma                                            between pre-procedure and post-procedure
                                                                 of LPI.
          iv.  Patient with other ocular diseases
                                                                 There was a significant difference in mean
             Results: 60 eyes were used out of which 50%         IOP, before and after LPI in different types of
          were male and 50% were female. Out of 30 eyes,         glaucoma patients.
          2% presented with Pupillary Blocked Glaucoma;
          2% with Neovascular Glaucoma; 5% with AACG;            Out of 60 eyes, 10% of the eyes were found
          5% with SACG; 8% with PACS; 38% with CACG;             to be (Grade 0) closed-angle, 77% eyes had
          and 40% of the eyes were with PACG. 50% were           (Grade 1) angle, 13% eyes had (Grade 2)
          found to be male and 50% were found to be              angle which after laser peripheral iridotomy
          female in the study, 14% were found to be in the       opened up to (Grade 2) -10% eyes, (Grade 3)
          age group of 20-40 years, 68% belonged to 41-60        -78% eyes and (Grade 4) - 12% eyes.
          years age group and 18% belonged to 61-80            CONCLUSION
          years age group.
                                                                 Laser Iridotomy is an established and
             There was no significant difference found in      approved clinical treatment for PACG as it
          terms of visual acuity after the Laser Peripheral    effectively reduces the IOP of patients, improves
          Iridotomy. Only patients of CACG showed vision       the visual acuity level, opens the anterior
          improvement post-procedure. In 60 patients, the      chamber angle, and facilitates the aqueous
          baseline IOP of 60 eyes was 28.58mm of hg, and       outflow thereby reducing the need for topical
          the mean target IOP was 20.41 mm of hg. which        anti-glaucoma medications. Nd: YAG laser
          was controlled after performing LPI and turned       iridotomy must be practised as the first line of
          to mean post-IOP 18.93mm of hg. Paired-t             treatment. It is also compliance free
          -test was performed for comparison for anti-         and cost-effective.
          glaucomatous medicines before and after LPI
          and showed a significant difference (p= 0.00).       ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
             In the Gonioscopy examination, Group A              This article has been written under the
          with 6 eyes had a grade 0 angle which after LPI      guidance of Dr. Jigisha Randeri, Thesis Guide,
          turned 4 eyes of grade 3 and 2 eyes of grade 4       Rotary Eye Institute. Navsari and Optom
          angle; Group B with 46 eyes had grade 1 angle        Nirav Mehta, Principal Hari Jyot College of
          which after LPI turned 6 eyes of grade 2; 35 eyes    Optometry, Navsari.
          of grade 3 and 5 eyes of grade 4; Group C with
          8 eyes had grade 2 eyes which after performing                   (References can be provided on request.
          LPI turned 8 eyes of grade 3 on Shaffer’s grading.                       Write to infotiodel@gmail.com)


                                                                                             119 | CASE STUDY
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128